Period underwear brand Thinx settles class action over 'non-toxic

$ 15.99

4.7 (526) In stock

Thinx Settles Lawsuit Alleging Harmful Chemicals In Its Period Panty Products - Yahoo Sports

Period underwear brand Thinx settles class action over 'non-toxic' briefs

The New York Times on X: The period underwear brand Thinx made public that it reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit claiming its products contain harmful chemicals, known as PFAS

Finding Your Perfect Period Underwear

Best PFAS-Free Period Underwear Brands • Organically Becca

PFAS in period underwear: Should you be worrying? - CNA Lifestyle

Should I be worried about toxic chemicals and Thinx?

The 12 Best Period Underwear of 2024, Tested and Reviewed

Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS

Period underwear brand Thinx settles class action over 'non-toxic' briefs

What to Know About the Thinx Class-Action Settlement

The Slow, Quiet Demise of Thinx

hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod/images/gh-period-unde

Related products

Underwear brand Knix apologizes for ad that critics say alluded to

Knix toxic chemicals $1.4M class action settlement - Top Class Actions

New lawsuit contends period products contain 'forever chemicals

Knix Period Underwear Class Action Settlement - Open to Claims Now If You Purchased Knix Underwear You Can Get Refunds : r/PeriodUnderwear

Up to 65% of period underwear contains toxic forever chemicals linked to infertility